To: Lorianne
Great idea as long as there is a warning somewhere visible. Otherwise the trespasser could win a suit against the sign-owner. The law generally does not support rigged devises meant to harm on one’s property regardless of the trespass. So the sign owner could sue for trespassing and the trespasser could sue the sign-owner for damages.
21 posted on
10/02/2016 9:47:04 AM PDT by
Jim W N
To: Jim 0216
A damn shame dogs and cows can’t read, isn’t it! /sarcasm
23 posted on
10/02/2016 9:53:41 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: Jim 0216
Do you need a sign telling you not to vandalize the property of others?
As you can tell your whole premise 'pisses me off'.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
24 posted on
10/02/2016 9:56:03 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson