Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Oh, don’t get me started on “loophole”. What an inaccurate word!

If it is legal, and part of the law, it isn’t a loophole.

Is declaring a church non-profit a loophole?

Is filling jointly a loophole (hey, the Gov could make MORE money but forcing everyone to file as single)?

Is having a home mortgage a loophole? Wouldn’t it be better to not allow this deduction? BUT...

The mortgage deduction is a relief on the middle class that helps encourage home ownership and a better lifestyle. The taxpayers, otherwise known as citizens, by virtual of their votes, want it.

So each and every “loophole” is to measure warranted and approved by the American people. That makes them NOT loopholes but rather circumstances the voters want.


73 posted on 10/02/2016 6:47:28 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!
-- Oh, don't get me started on "loophole". What an inaccurate word! --

Heheheh. My point was that it swings both ways. Like the WIC and EITC loopholes, where people get money for nothing.

77 posted on 10/02/2016 6:51:17 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!
“loophole”

Taxing income is patently un-American and immoral in the first place.

None of those guys memorialized in Granite in Washington ever paid a penny to the "IRS".

83 posted on 10/02/2016 6:56:47 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, RINOs......same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

It is not a loophole in any sense. A net operating loss carryforward is allowable under section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code.


114 posted on 10/02/2016 8:21:04 AM PDT by Friend of the Friendless (R-Illinois)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson