Oh, my, I sincerely hope her dissertation committee rejects this one, with prejudice. Anyone capable of this level of anti-thought is *not* PhD material in any subject.
So she reviewed 8 syllabi and found no hint of sexism in them. As a result, she had to invent sexism for them by claiming that women and minorities are too stupid to understand and think through problems requiring objective observation, experimentation, and analysis? And then she is able to conclude that science is sexist because it has no room for subjectivism. I wonder if this little pile of sand for brains is aware that an ideal of the scientific method is to set aside personal opinion, to remove oneself from the experimental process as much as possible? Is she completely blind to her own profound racism and sexism?
A perusal of 8 syllabi is woefully inadequate for PhD research. Furthermore, she displayed no critical thinking or analytic skills. If her university awards her the PhD on that weak basis, it should have its accreditation reviewed. The only silver lining here is that whatever subject she is pursuing for her PhD, it is not a marketable job skill.
That's not really a silver lining. It means she is only qualified to teach the next generation.
Also, I think the idea that women are emotional and men are not is complete BS. I believe men are just as emotional (and illogical at times) as women: They just don't display their emotions as openly as women do.