Posted on 09/26/2016 11:27:58 PM PDT by Zakeet
It started with a mystifying missed opportunity on race. It ended with a piercing attack on gender.
Hillary Clinton's performance in the first presidential debate on Monday veered from uncertain and tentative to firm and, ultimately, scorching.
No amount of practice, it seemed, could fully prepare her - or perhaps anyone - for Donald J. Trump's hurricane of factual distortion, taunting interruptions and blustery generalities.
Mrs. Clinton seemed to slowly but steadily learn how to confront and subdue Mr. Trump on the fly, as tens of millions of Americans watched.
[Snip]
Mrs. Clinton eventually found her footing in the second half of the debate. The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
BTW, the photos are Barbaro on left/Flegenheimer on right.
CNN poll says Hillary won by 62% to 27% , and that , unfortunately , is the one the Japanese Yahoo site is using in their top news stories .
I think the first one is in the dictionary next to the definition of “double-handled douchebag” and the second one is next to “wet fart.”
I bet they wrote that wishful thinking tripe last week...
Hillary showed herself to be one scorching mean nasty racist sexist biotch. And her comments about the beauty pagents were totally uncalled for.
Scorching! That must be the word of the day pushed out to the MSM. So we’ll see if it shows up in every spin interview today.
LOL.
How much of that article was written before the debate started?
Are those ladies?
Only thing scorching was his anal cavity at the thought of Clinton winning.
It was very, very obvious that she was given the questions ahead of time. She started answering before Lester even finished asking the questions.
Her shrill voice is NOT going to get her many votes from the real men in this country. She will get the mamby, pamby gay vote and the bull dyke vote.
I think that Hillary won the last 5-10m of the debate, the people polled were the ones that watched it all the way to the end.
The problem is, almost no one watched to the end.
Most of the online poll takers tuned out early and never saw Clinton win at any point in the debate.
Journobloggers for Sulzberger’s Blog.
The New York Times can’t kiss her butt enough... have they EVER been critical of Hillary?
“Scorching” as in burning in Hell?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.