I'm not at all mistaken about the ONE point I addressed. Obama and McCain and all those who supported arming various groups in Syria had no clue as to their true loyalties and intentions. The silliness about good rebels and bad rebels and vetted rebels was ridiculous.
There have been numerous reports of US supplied weapons ending up in the wrong hands and groups we armed fighting each other or joining groups considered to be the enemy.
But if you want to believe Obama had some perfect understanding of the milieu of loyalties and intentions in Syria go ahead and believe it.
As I said, my comment addressed ONE point and you took off on numerous tangents.
I stand by my contention that the mess in Syria was and is completely deliberate. Obola has deliberately set the middle east on fire via actions that repeatedly serve to support radical Muslims versus secular government in at least six countries.
By way of power vacuum premature pull out, Obola deliberately eff’ed up:
1. Iraq, and
2. Afghanistan
3. deliberately supported Muslim Brotherhood rule in Egypt, 4. deliberately disrupted Libya, by arming and funding al-Queda and overthrowing Kadafi.
5. went to war with Syria’s secular leaning gov’t, by arming and funding al-Queda islamic fundamentalist “rebels”.
6. Gave the Iranian muslim extremist government BILLIONS and permission to build nuclear wespons.
Obvious foreign policy pattern of deliberately using Islamic fundamentalism for creative destruction, wouldn’t you say?
‘Specially considering our Commander-in-chief has stated that he believes “there’s no sweeter sound than the Islamic morning call prayer”, and promised he “will stand with Islam in the face of ugly winds”
There’s nothing accidental about Obola’s promised “Fundamental transformation” of America.
“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” - (attributed to FDR)
Machiavellianism - the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct, often by creating a crisis in which a predetermined solution achieves a desired goal. The end justifies the means.
RE: “Sadly mistaken.
I’m not at all mistaken about the ONE point I addressed. Obama and McCain and all those who supported arming various groups in Syria had no clue as to their true loyalties and intentions. The silliness about good rebels and bad rebels and vetted rebels was ridiculous.
There have been numerous reports of US supplied weapons ending up in the wrong hands and groups we armed fighting each other or joining groups considered to be the enemy.
But if you want to believe Obama had some perfect understanding of the milieu of loyalties and intentions in Syria go ahead and believe it.
As I said, my comment addressed ONE point and you took off on numerous tangents.”