[Lakeshark]

I noticed you didn't deal with the most important point, rather you snarked about it, so here it is again: My take is simple, this is a business man who brought virtually ALL of his projects in under budget and on time. I think he will be the most trustworthy of any of our candidates on the policy of cutting spending and meeting budgets.

I can confidently tell you, here is a man who has actual experience in meeting budgets, here is a man who can genuinely deal with fraud and waste, while what you seem to do is want to whine about it.

If you read his plan on healthcare you would not be so ignorant of it.

Yes, I'll be surprised to find you didn't vote for Cruz.

What I'm looking for is simple: A rational discussion with a reasonably well informed person.

[DoodleDawg]

My take is simple, this is a business man who brought virtually ALL of his projects in under budget and on time. I think he will be the most trustworthy of any of our candidates on the policy of cutting spending and meeting budgets.

OK.

I can confidently tell you, here is a man who has actual experience in meeting budgets, here is a man who can genuinely deal with fraud and waste, while what you seem to do is want to whine about it.

What you call whining I would call looking for answers, explanations, or clarifications. Why is that so wrong?

If you read his plan on healthcare you would not be so ignorant of it.

Third time. I have read it. Pick a point in it and tell me where I'm wrong.

What I'm looking for is simple: A rational discussion with a reasonably well informed person.

No, what you want is someone who looks at Trump with the same level of admiration that you do. Sorry I can't provide it.