Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana; P-Marlowe

I see no reason a church should be taken to task for endorsing a candidate. Supposedly, it is because they have a ‘tax exemption’, but a church must be exempt from taxes based on the first amendment. Taking a church’s money is saying they can only have 90% free exercise and not 100% free exercise.

So, I agree with you that even that is unconstitutional.

Most folks think it means that pastors don’t pay taxes. Trust me (I am one.)...we pay taxes. MORE than the average citizen actually, because we have to pay on income as if employed, and on benefits as if self-employed. IOW, we have to pay 14% social security and not just 7% on non-income parts of the pay package. I have no idea how the IRS arrived at that logic.


20 posted on 09/26/2016 6:03:16 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
I have no idea how the IRS arrived at that logic.

For tax purposes, churches are treated as other non-profits, who similarly aren't supposed to be endorsing candidates. You know, like the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Harvard University, Planned Parenthood, etc.
24 posted on 09/26/2016 6:24:41 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson