Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump on a Number of Issues is BETTER Than What Passes for Conservatism Today
Conservative HQ ^ | 26 Sep 16 | Gary Bauer

Posted on 09/26/2016 5:19:56 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
We must not forget the point of the Trump win. We oppose the corrupt establishment.

They are fighting to save their lives tonight through their champion, Hillary Clinton.

Arrayed against Trump will be the heart of the UniParty establishment: the Republican leadership + the total democratic establishment and party, the media, the chamber of commerce, the globalist economic and charitable trusts, and finally the globalist social ideology.

Trump has a daunting task. They will have their minions on the web and on the air immediately to declare Trump errors and Clinton victories.

We must counter that. If we don't, no one else will.

1 posted on 09/26/2016 5:19:56 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

We must not forget the point of the Trump win. We oppose the corrupt establishment.

They are fighting to save their lives tonight through their champion, Hillary Clinton.

Arrayed against Trump will be the heart of the UniParty establishment: the Republican leadership + the total democratic establishment and party, the media, the chamber of commerce, the globalist economic and charitable trusts, and finally the globalist social ideology.

Trump has a daunting task. They will have their minions on the web and on the air immediately to declare Trump errors and Clinton victories.

We must counter that. If we don’t, no one else will.


2 posted on 09/26/2016 5:20:10 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

So many fakers-


3 posted on 09/26/2016 5:20:50 AM PDT by orchestra ((And there were also two other, malefactors, led with him to be put to death.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

He’s up to a 42.9% chance on the “polls plus” section in 538!

Closing in!!!!


4 posted on 09/26/2016 5:21:55 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Exactly! This needed to be said.


5 posted on 09/26/2016 5:22:11 AM PDT by uncitizen (JFK: The first victim of the New World Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

It’s coming down to Colorado in that particular methodology....a few more good polls in Colorado, then, boom.

Nate will show Trump winning.

Then libs will really start to howl and the wheels are going to come off!


6 posted on 09/26/2016 5:23:11 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins

There has not been a real conservative candidate since Ronald Reagan. Trump might win the election in a landslide on novelty alone. People have seen liberalism/progressivism in all its loathsome fury. Enough of them may want to give real conservatism a try for once.


7 posted on 09/26/2016 5:25:57 AM PDT by Ciaphas Cain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I will not guarantee that conservatives will applaud everything Donald Trump does. But I can guarantee that Hillary Clinton will do nothing conservatives might applaud.

Sums it all up in a nutshell.

8 posted on 09/26/2016 5:26:39 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Excellent summation. Trump could mop the floor with Hillary tonight, but you won’t see or hear it on the post debate analysis on the alphabet network and cable news shows nor will you read it in any of the papers or their blog sites. In the post debate I’m going to every site with a poll and I’m going to post statements everywhere. You’re right Trump has a daunting task and we certainly have to do our parts to help him.


9 posted on 09/26/2016 5:31:39 AM PDT by dowcaet (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I agree. That was the major money quote in the article in my opinion.


10 posted on 09/26/2016 5:31:49 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: orchestra

The Bushes have been forever outed. They might as well reregister as democrats.


11 posted on 09/26/2016 5:32:22 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Conservative procedures at this point will not work as the current administration took radical steps to ensure the next president could not succeed. $20T debt (that we know of) and the unfunded liabilities 6 times higher than that require the next president to take radical action. That’s just for starters on that one front. Many front battles have been initiated with near certain defeat all lined up for the next president. When Genghis Khan hordes are cresting over the hills and you being blinded by the Sun glinting off the waving cutlery, you don’t start planting wheat.


12 posted on 09/26/2016 5:40:12 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Her is also the first candidate I have heard ho is willing to dump Johnson Rule that muzzles ministers, priests and rabbis.


13 posted on 09/26/2016 5:43:49 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Yep. It makes sense that religious conservatives support that gesture from Trump.

At the same time, and church that muzzles their pastor doesn’t understand the law. Their pastor can preach whatever God lays on his heart.

What they cannot do is have the church administrative body endorse a candidate.


14 posted on 09/26/2016 5:46:43 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Trump is on a roll.

If he is even vaguely perceived as a winner tonight by watchers, then this race might be his to lose in terms of the electoral college.


15 posted on 09/26/2016 5:47:56 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What they cannot do is have the church administrative body endorse a candidate.

There is a net chilling effect (which, oddly, doesn't apply to leftist movement black churches or imams.

The rule is unconstitutional on its face, but no one is willing to risk challenging it, or it is setled out of court to avoid a ruling.
16 posted on 09/26/2016 5:54:44 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xzins

agreed

(even so, the state by state still matters...and it appears that Colorado is the current tipping point....)


17 posted on 09/26/2016 5:56:38 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Conservative is as Conservative does


18 posted on 09/26/2016 5:56:47 AM PDT by Eddie01 (Democrats are the Liquidate America Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Conservatism died with the first George Bush

We have been played for fools for 28 years


19 posted on 09/26/2016 5:58:03 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; P-Marlowe

I see no reason a church should be taken to task for endorsing a candidate. Supposedly, it is because they have a ‘tax exemption’, but a church must be exempt from taxes based on the first amendment. Taking a church’s money is saying they can only have 90% free exercise and not 100% free exercise.

So, I agree with you that even that is unconstitutional.

Most folks think it means that pastors don’t pay taxes. Trust me (I am one.)...we pay taxes. MORE than the average citizen actually, because we have to pay on income as if employed, and on benefits as if self-employed. IOW, we have to pay 14% social security and not just 7% on non-income parts of the pay package. I have no idea how the IRS arrived at that logic.


20 posted on 09/26/2016 6:03:16 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson