No, I'm no general but the U.S. has many more and better conventional assets. Problem is, a war with Russia would quickly escalate into a nuclear exchange which would quickly turn to full mutual destruction.
How long did analysts think Russia would just look the other way as the U.S. destroys another Middle East country, allow slaughter of more Christians, and create more jihadis?? It seems the neocon goal over the past few decades is to destabilize and/or destroy countries for geo-strategic reasons. And the weapon of choice has been jihadis. I thought the bankruptcy of this idea would be clearly seen after 9/11. But it's stronger than ever and gave us ISIS.
.
>> “which would quickly turn to full mutual destruction.” <<
Which is nowhere to be found in Bible prophecy.
The strikes will be on Damascus and Jerusalem for sure, and probably London and Rome. Those two cities are the headquarters of Satan’s forces.
You couldn’t be more wrong. We don’t have the manpower, the weapons, or the political fortitude to entertain a war with Russia. Plus China is Russia ally.