But he answered it. The current mayor was responsible for stopping the practice. Holt said it was deemed unconstitutional but Trump corrected him.
Do you really think Trump won points on that because the mayor took it out of the court's hands?
Do you think a higher court couldn't rule exactly the same thing?
At best, Trump's rather verbose response was only a temporary answer.
Don't get me wrong. It need's to be done, but unless Trump can get in to FIRE the people who would take it to a higher court, he just marked time.