I take this as an extremely positive sign!
If a politician, either directly or via their PAC, donates to a candidate, it is an endorsement. If a business person donates, they are either paying protection money and/or trying to buy influence; they see it as just the cost of doing business. This is why I dismiss DJT’s past donations out of hand.
So why is this positive? First off, there is not much confidence in Hillary’s victory on the part of the CEOs. Otherwise, they would be making the investment. Caveat: does this story include donations to the Clinton Crime Family’s foundation? Second, it is a strong
This story is comforting, not alarming.
... it is a strong indication they think DJT cannot be bought.