I watched this video a few times. It reminds me of the protestors videos where they show all the action until the real action and then they get interested in the grass real quick.
We missed the deceased exiting the vehicle, but he was out of the vehicle and there was a weapon on the ground. From the timing there is no way an officer could drop a “planted” weapon with 4 other officers around.
So, since the wife didn’t want to respect the investigation and released her own video - which is already being talked on the street as showing a cold-blooded killing, thereby inflating emotions again, it’s now necessary to release all videos, defense of the officers be damned.
We used to have a court system. Now life is a reality show. I’m glad I’m old.
Yes we also messed how he got from the drivers door all the way to the front of the police vehicle some 25 feet or so away.
Did he rush them?
And .. the forensic tests of the “weapon” - which is clearly visible in the video - while the wife was swearing her husband didn’t have one; was found to have Scott’s blood and his fingerprints.
SOOOOOO .. THERE WAS A WEAPON .. AND THE FORENSICS PROVE HE HELD IT AND HIS BLOOD WAS ON IT INDICATING HE PROBABLY HAD IT IN HIS HAND WHEN HE WAS SHOT.
CASE OVER !!!!!!!
And .. there was NO BOOK.