Posted on 09/23/2016 9:57:12 AM PDT by artichokegrower
A new study that examines some major health care proposals from the presidential candidates finds that Donald Trump would cause about 20 million to lose coverage while Hillary Clinton would provide coverage for an additional 9 million people.
(Excerpt) Read more at santacruzsentinel.com ...
The entire story focuses on who would gain or lose coverage under the Trump vs. Clinton plans. One itsy bitsy little thing was missing from the story — how much all of this costs. Hillary’s plan would drive us further into bankruptcy and substandard health options. Trumps would re-invigorate market-driven healthcare that is truly affordable. Bias anyone?
Santa Cruz Sentinel- enough said
Great posting on Blumenthal. Thanks!
Noting that I will gladly Vote Trump, please consider the following.
Patriots are reminded that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for INTRAstate healthcare purposes. So Obamacare is unconstitutional regardless what lawless Obama’s state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices want everybody to think about the constitutionality of Obamacare.
Patriots need to get constititionally low-information Trump up to speed on unconstitutional federal healthcare.
Does the study mention that more than 20 million lost their health care under Obama? Does the study mention that Obamacare never really picked up those who had no health care?
Does the study mention that Obamacare provides few, in some cases, zero options for selection of heath care providers?
Does the study mention the skyrocketing cost of health care in terms of co-pays, monthly premiums, coverage, and out of reach deductibles?
Very true. Like Trump says, it’s going down on its own, so he he will repeal and replace it.
I think a key point lost in this debate is healthcare insurance coverage and actual healthcare. If the deductibles are so high people still can’t afford to pay for needed care, or there are no doctors available, what good does insurance do?
The IRS is notifying 20 million right now.
Just to see the word “study” headlining an article is cause to not read it at all, knowing it’s just slanted BS with little or nor significant real facts or truth. Just opinion, often from the left.
Then when studies, such as global warming related, get “computer models” made, which are created by people with opinions, to make it look scientific, it just pegs the BS meter so hard the needle falls off.
Bingo! All I ever wanted or needed was catastrophic insurance, which was a high deductible and didn’t pay for childbirth even though I can’t bear a child. Of course obamacare made that illegal. People still have the high deductibles though, and with the unaffordable prices they still can’t afford the healthcare even with insurance.
Yeah, and without wasting my time reading this alleged study, we can surmise it was propagated by the same wonderful folks who first conned us with Obamacare. There were several Republican plans that would have accomplished in fact what the fiction that is Obamacare foolishly claimed it would.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.