Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative
Since the two fuels compete directly for the same market — the power plants that light American homes — it is effectively impossible to increase production of one without decreasing the other.

I've read that statement many times - can't believe a college educated person would make a statement like that. First, they don't consider overseas markets, and second, it assumes no new homes are built.

21 posted on 09/22/2016 6:33:35 PM PDT by 11th_VA (It's all gonna change once Trump's president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 11th_VA

Environmental concerns would seem to favor burning coal where the combustion products can be economically dealt with,a d cleaner gas burned in homes and other small users .

Heating homes with electricity wastes two thirds of the energy compared with heating by burning gas in a modern high efficiency furnace.


26 posted on 09/22/2016 6:45:30 PM PDT by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson