Seems to be some curlicue of the law in which he could end up liable, making for a figurative hot seat for him.
The only sensible thing would be to pass stewardship of the prosecution to someone who wasn’t in the thick of the action against the narsty bikers, but Abel keeps on wanting to be the hero here.
We know the bikers are bad. We don’t expect governments to be.
IBTG.
[We don’t expect governments to be] ... well, we don’t, inasmuch as we have some kind of democratic, or indirect democratic, influence over them. Pragmatically we shouldn’t be surprised. In a place that can give us a Barack Obama as a president, lesser follies should scarcely surprise us.
It looks like this fight of ego is going to beckon on a backlash; of what exact kind remains to be seen. And it will way transcend the issue of some bikers, of whatever ill repute.
The County must decide if he was acting within scope of employment and then make a decision regarding the use of what is probably a joint liability insurance policy. It is common for police to carry a liability policy, because you can’t alway trust your department to support you in court.
It is, and it protects them from frivolous lawsuits...such as this one.
What problem does Reyna have with answering this simple question?