Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Donglalinger

You would think that NBC could get better polling numbers when polling hildabeast’s HQ. From the internals:

45 D
37 R
18 I

This is propaganda, not a scientific poll. This is as scientific as the typical glo-bull warming published paper.


25 posted on 09/21/2016 3:22:43 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rigelkentaurus

That’s the internals? That many Rats and so little independents. Really. ...unreal


33 posted on 09/21/2016 3:30:38 PM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: rigelkentaurus

Oversampled D+8.

During the primaries the NBC-WSJ poll had often undercounted Trump by significant margin. For example in the PA primary it had predicted Trump would get 45%, but he actually got 55%.

They were off by 10 points, well outside the MoE.


38 posted on 09/21/2016 3:46:16 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: rigelkentaurus

Does anyone know what the breakdown was for Democrats vs. Republicans vs. Independents for the 2012 election? I’m just wondering what sort of breakdown we should be expecting this year.


48 posted on 09/21/2016 4:15:26 PM PDT by SweetPatriot84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson