Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

They talk about her as if she would be a continuation of Bill. But she wouldn’t. She’s far worse. Because she’s an idiot.


77 posted on 09/19/2016 10:36:17 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ichabod1
They talk about her as if she would be a continuation of Bill. But she wouldn’t. She’s far worse. Because she’s an idiot.

Bill Clinton never got 50% of the popular vote. Ross Perot ran specifically to drain off the anti-NAFTA vote and to keep George H. W. Bush from a second term. In 1988, he had to seriously torpedo his own campaign to keep from winning. And he was a lot more popular than Hillary.

Perot ran again in 1992, but probably wasn't needed, as Dole was a weak candidate, but Clinton didn't get 50% then either. The Clintons won by manipulation, not because they were beloved.

127 posted on 09/19/2016 6:59:01 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson