Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws
Her Royal Heinous is a bit of a test, really, a test to see if the political establishment, the media, and the academic "opinion making" machine has accrued political power sufficient to package and elect a candidate who has never actually won an election at the national level on her own merits. Her New York senatorial seat was precisely such an experiment itself at a state level, as was 0bama's campaign at a national level, and their success has led, I think, to a certain hubris on the part of the aforementioned machine.

It clearly was a fairly significant miscalculation, because Yeb! Bush was exactly the same sort of candidate with, such as it is, a more solid track record than She Who Must Not Be Named. 0bama must be considered a rather special case inasmuch as race became the factor that dares not to speak its name. Feminism has proven an entirely inadequate substitute in this election, outdated to begin with and thoroughly uninspiring except to a small coterie of True Believers. Who takes a "glass ceiling" seriously when its complainant has a hundred million in the bank and a term (however disastrous) at State behind her capacious belt?

It is not so much populism that informs the Trump campaign, but patriotism and iconoclasm. Either one of the latter will suffice, which explains the draw he has for the nominally incompatible Bernie crowd. Establishment statists mouthing proto-revolutionary slogans are the most laughably insincere and unconvincing candidates on the slate - here again I cite my man Yeb! - and attempting to seem cool has led a 70-year-old woman to flail mightily at a cartoon frog as a serious statement of political acumen. It's painful to watch and with painful desserts. Please clap.

26 posted on 09/19/2016 9:36:41 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill

I really think 2008 was McCain’s to lose. He made some serious gaffes but his loss was by a slim enough margin despite Obama’s advantages. His three big mistakes were the suspension of his campaign to vote for a massive stimulus package everybody was already voting for; muzzling Palin when she was eager to campaign; and his lackluster performance in the debates where he refused to draw any meaningful distinction between himself and his opponent.

By comparison, he pulled no punches against his primary challenger in 2010, JD Hayworth. He fought with a vigor and tenacity never displayed when he was running for President.


115 posted on 09/19/2016 3:56:34 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson