Replies

Weren't religious charitable organizations the first ones responsible for bringing them in? I can see the motive if the long term intention is to convert them to “Christianity”. Does the religious leadership who these charities report to ever ask “How many conversions?” (Personally I think that for the most part it is at best naïve and foolish action.) However I doubt if that “conversion rate” question ever gets asked. The motive for these organizations is likely the federal dollars not selfless charity, a wealth of “refugee care & welfare” money probably flow into their coffers. I am sure the members of these organizations get the added benefit of feeling morally superior to the common taxpayer herd , particular superior to conservatives and infinitely superior to people like me who ask “What's the return on investment from these actions?”

I think laws need to be passed that makes these organizations both financially and even criminally liable for the actions of their “”charity cases”. They brought them here and have for all intents and purposes assumed “loco parentis” on these “Martians”. And they are “Martian” for they have no more in common with American & Western Civilization then a herd of space aliens! Religious charities you want them here so you can wallow in your moral superiority then take responsibility for them, for both their behavior & their acculturation.

Your post #85.

Weren't religious charitable organizations the first ones responsible for bringing them in?

I hope I am not remiss in mentioning the source for some quick research by me. I used a Breitbart article by Michael Patrick Leahy 2015. I will be as accurate as I can. Named are the Lutheran Church and Catholic Charity group. It seems- this is my own interpretation, that massive sums are then contributed by the government (taxpayer). The church groups siphon off as much as 25% for their administration.

Now totally removed from this elsewhere is this. That a pastor of the Lutheran Church was found to have a sudden massive increase in his personal salary. If this is true, then at least it should be out there in public. No concern at all for the average member of the public, who then sees resources strained to the limit. Called racist if they even complain.