Posted on 09/13/2016 2:51:27 PM PDT by unixfox
Why let Lerner off the hook?
Wow, Congress is going to DO something...???!?!
Sorry, too good to be true.
Need to impeach the FBI guy too. And Kerry. And Obama.
So what if he’s impeached? He’s 77.
Conviction is unlikely, and he doesn’t have the decency to resign unless he’s booted out by a Trump administration.
If he is convicted, he won’t be able to hold public office. So? And what happens to his exceedingly cushy pension? Remember, Lois Lerner gave us the finger, and retired into the sunset with something like a 160K/year pension. He’s higher up on the food chain.
She, like Hillary, Obama, and the rest of their ilk should all be in prison.
Senators run for cover with their tails between their legs from the scary resolution.
“Resolutions” are “tsk-tsk” gestures. Nothing more.
Absolutely Lerner should be in prison. At the very least she should lose her pension.
Too Little, Too Late, They should have JAILED HIM A LONG TIME AGO, Along with Lois Lerner.
Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!
“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”
Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions. One has to wonder how a previous Congress might have responded to Alberto Gonzales’s endless recitations of “I do not recall.”
Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR
No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!
CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.
In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.
I’ll bet a President Trump would fire him.
donate Learner to ISIS
5 years too late. They let Lerner walk, now the new idiot is being used as a show pony.
Leni
Awww... that’s cute how they pretend to actually do their job.
Now, Josh. Come clean. This is a career destroyer. Somebody told you to do this. What was their name and position? You don’t owe them anything, certainly not the ruination of an impeachment. Tell us what we want to know informally, right now, and we’ll get you immunity to say it on the record and under oath. If we can’t get you immunity, this conversation never happened. What do you say? You wanna get tossed under the bus and laughed at, or take down the real culprit.
As usual it’s all for show and NOTHING will happen to this POS.
I wish they could go after his pension, but he would probably immediately retire if the resolution included that.
As far as I’m concerned Congress is best when it does little. Thus what else do they have to do with their time except impeach leftists?
Some of the attacks on tea party organizations were actually orchestrated by Republicans like John McCain. He’s one of the guys who ask the IRS to get involved if I remember correctly. McCain and Lindsey Graham
This guy could be impeached in the house but would not be found guilty of the charges in the Senate however. The good news is that impeachment by the house pretty much cripples an individual from ever working in or having a position of honor ever again... except within the Democratic Party
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.