Posted on 09/13/2016 12:46:23 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Senator, yes.
I was sure they were going to have her run for Boxer’s seat this year.
But they didn’t.
Hmm don’t know how she could take Boxer’s seat in California—they don’t have property there, have not lived there...but she could take a seat in Illinois which has been trial ballooned ;(
It`s hard to imagine the Dems being that tone deaf, but then again they`ve already exceeded expectations by nominating an invilid with major scandals hanging over her head. Still hard to believe they would do something so stupid. But Roger Stone`s track record this election has been near perfect.
Neither did Hillary in NY.
They would have bought something there.
It would be a sure win.
I think she may not want to do a Hillary.
Well I don’t know how long Hillary lived in New York prior to running...Under the law (Remember the good old days when the law mattered?), usually there is some sort of residence requirement for a period of time. They own property in Illinois that has not been rented out, so she could easily run there. I agree that I don’t know that she would want to run...too much work?!
I predicted Michelle would be picked many months ago. I expected some feedback, but only got silence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.