Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BatGuano

Maybe I’m seeing things, but that airplane looks like it could become an actual fighter plane with the addition of weapons.

I’m referring specifically to the full-area control surfaces on the tail. These make it suitable for supersonic flight, correct?


18 posted on 09/13/2016 1:58:58 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Tom
It's supposed to replace the T-38 Talon, which is supersonic ... that's the whole point. It's a supersonic trainer for pilots who will transition to supersonic fighters.
19 posted on 09/13/2016 2:01:16 PM PDT by NorthMountain (Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Steely Tom

Well, not so sure that the “full area control surfaces on the tail” are necessary for supersonic flight but it looks more like the F-16 than the F-16 itself.
I flew an airplane in the Ohio ANG, the F-84F, that was “supersonic.” The limiting Mach was 1.1...and achieved in a dive. The airplane had full area horizontal stabilizers but really a fighter-bomber, not an air superiority fighter like the F-15.


21 posted on 09/13/2016 7:41:11 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson