Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long
That likely nails the underlying deal, with Levin....the Trade agreement. They must’ve gotten to him with $$....to promote this globalist crap sandwich.

I lost him when he got hysterical becauase Trump said he wanted to renegotiate the trade deals. Mark went right to worst case scenario. Mark is a lawyer and remember lawyers are experts on everything /sarc. I heard his treatise on the Depression and tariffs and he spouted his limited knowledge and 11th grade history book details on what caused and exacerbated it and he lost me. I have a BS in Economics and an MBA from Cal and I can say without a doubt he sounded ignorant on the subject, confusing the Laffer curve, tariffs, individual income taxes and trade policy. It was a confused mess he tried to wrap with a Conservsative philsophical bow.

25 posted on 09/13/2016 7:36:41 AM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: pburgh01

Somebody on this board had a saying: “A free trade deal takes one paragraph. These deals aren’t free trade.”

Very succinct.

What I have actually heard Trump say is we are going to re-evaluate our trade deals, and re-negotiate deals with nations on an individual basis - no more making deals with the entire Pacific rim, etc.

This actually sounds similar to what a company in bankruptcy would do...and it makes sense, as we cannot continue forever with our current deals. It seems logical, and measured...but Levin won’t even have a discussion about it, just a tantrum.


39 posted on 09/13/2016 8:04:56 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson