Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theoilpainter
There is also the fairness issue: Trump and Clinton have been thoroughly vetted for POTUS. The new guy for that job?

Sticking in a ringer would be bad for the Democrats, but they have done it before and they have bounced back from it. In 1968 Humphrey was nominated, even though he hadn't run in a single primary. After Johnson's withdrawal and Kennedy's assassination McGovern was next in line according to the primary vote tally. The party didn't want McGovern so they just picked Humphrey. That's why the '68 convention drew massive protests.

106 posted on 09/11/2016 3:51:15 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: SeeSharp

If they chose either Biden or Kerry, each would have previously been vetted.


160 posted on 09/11/2016 4:53:46 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson