Skip to comments.
(CNN Money) Problem: Most Americans don't believe the unemployment rate is 5%
CNN Money ^
| 9-6-2016
| Heather Long
Posted on 09/06/2016 10:01:08 PM PDT by tcrlaf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: tcrlaf
I’m still waiting for my Chocolate Ration increase.
21
posted on
09/06/2016 11:21:12 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(Hillary Clinton has killed FIVE* more People than Three Mile Island. *revised...)
To: Jack Hammer; All
The numbers have been cooked for years.
People are taken off the list if they give up looking for work.
MBAs delivering pizzas are counted as employed and off the list.
The ‘disability’ rolls are filled up to take people off unemployment lists.
It’s a scam.
94 million out of the work force. Unemployed and underemployed is more like 20% right now.
To: BookmanTheJanitor
“Funny how CNN didnt mention the labor participation rate. Hmmm....”
Right, how many millions have dropped out of the workforce again...?
Aside from that, underemployment is a huge issue. A job at McDonalds isn’t the same as a $100K/year position.
I also still see a lot of small businesses failing. I’m pretty sure the owners aren’t included in unemployment statistics...
23
posted on
09/06/2016 11:38:58 PM PDT
by
PreciousLiberty
(Trump/Pence 2016! Make America Greater Than Ever!)
To: tcrlaf
Many of the nation's top economic experts say that America is "near full employment." I can imagine Tokyo Rose broadcasting this.
24
posted on
09/06/2016 11:45:40 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: allendale
That’s pretty much it. Reasonably coherent observers assume that when Hillary’s lips are moving, she’s lying. They only listen to judge the quality of the lie.
25
posted on
09/06/2016 11:46:06 PM PDT
by
gogeo
(Black Lives Matter to Donald Trump.)
To: tcrlaf
Watch, when Trump get elected all the stats will all of the sudden become realistic again.
26
posted on
09/07/2016 12:38:33 AM PDT
by
slouper
(LWRC SPR 5.56)
To: 9YearLurker
She’s an expensive whore, like almost every other media person in New York.
To: gitmo
The official unemployment rate measures the gullibility of the public in the area of swallowing obviously fraudulent economic numbers.
28
posted on
09/07/2016 12:44:32 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(This message has been encrypted in ROT13 twice for maximum security)
To: TigerClaws
Actually, probably much closer to 50%.
29
posted on
09/07/2016 1:07:58 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: tcrlaf
To: tcrlaf
A lot of millennials may actually be lazy, but I know so many in my area that can't find a job that will give them more than 20-25 hours a week. And they can't live on this. My daughter is in college, but it took her sending out forty resumes online, yes resumes not just applications, to find a summer job as a hostess in a restaurant. She began applying in March. At school many students are talking about how they couldn't find a summer job, so they took out more in loans. None of these younger people are counted in the unemployment numbers, and that's just talking about younger people. I guess that's why many wanted Bernie. Desperation. My daughter attended her first college republicans meeting tonight as a matter of fact and said she met the nicest group of kids on the campus. I was proud of her, some her “friends” tried telling her not to go. Many conservative kids, she said she felt at home.
To: gitmo
This imaginary “5%” figure is one of many measures in the official report, specifically U-3. Basically, it’s only people getting unemployment checks.
Nobody publishes U-6, which is far more accurate in that it includes people more people who are, how can I put this in layman’s terms, not working. :-)
32
posted on
09/07/2016 2:11:04 AM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: jiggyboy
Unemployment compensation does not figure into any of the U numbers. So basically, you are incorrect.
33
posted on
09/07/2016 2:23:24 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: BookmanTheJanitor
“Funny how CNN didnt mention the labor participation rate. Hmmm....”.........
I have said it many, many times, “You can word a poll any way you want to achieve the desired outcome.” I have literally “zero” faith in polls.
34
posted on
09/07/2016 2:28:06 AM PDT
by
DaveA37
(t)
To: 1rudeboy
I’m touched that you still troll me after all these years.
35
posted on
09/07/2016 2:32:14 AM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: jiggyboy
If you define pointing out your bullcrap as “trolling” in order to make yourself feel intelligent, have at it . . . I plan to be on FR a long time, pushing back the frontier of economic ignorance.
36
posted on
09/07/2016 2:38:18 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: tcrlaf
Unemployment is probably close to that number. Under employment is a better indicator. You still have to pay the bills.
To: tcrlaf
Here within the KS City metro, I have only to look around me as I pass through the business district and see all the buildings bearing for sale-or-rent and closed signs all around me during business hours to see what the true economic conditions are. And its not pretty like the administration's officials want me to think or believe.
What I see tells me our economy is in terrible shape no matter what CNN wants me to think.
38
posted on
09/07/2016 3:14:08 AM PDT
by
egfowler3
(What was it I was going to say here anyway?? Anyone care to remind me?)
To: tcrlaf
Stupid peasants don't believe that their chocolate ration has increased to 25 grams, either.
Very well, we will increase it to 20, and the floggings will continue until morale improves.
39
posted on
09/07/2016 3:20:21 AM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(If Trump loses, America dies)
To: BookmanTheJanitor
>>Funny how CNN didnt mention the labor participation rate. Hmmm....
The media never does. The Globalist Progressive Republicans never do. The Anti-Colonialist Progressive Democrats never do.
40
posted on
09/07/2016 3:24:03 AM PDT
by
Bryanw92
(If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson