[anoldafvet]

This e-mail is dated 17 months before the attack, how is it relevant, except being sent on an unsecured server?

[Parley Baer]

“This e-mail is dated 17 months before the attack, how is it relevant, except being sent on an unsecured server?”

It shows how Ambassador Stevens was moving about. It would give people an idea of how to track him.

[fivecatsandadog]

Wow... someone actually using their head to THINK!!! 17 months before the actual attack is exactly right. If this email was within A WEEK of the attack, ok - she’s cooked. But this is just more bait and BS being thrown out to see who bites.

[CyberAnt]

It’s telling Stevens movements .. and where he may be going next.

THIS IS A NO-NO TO THE HIGHEST DEGREE. This is the same as giving away troop movements .. you’re telling the enemy when and where you can kill our men in the field.

IGNORANT; OR DIDN’T CARE IF STEVENS DIED ..????

BUT IT’S PUNISHABLE .. THAT’S FOR SURE.

[thoughtomator]

Sure. Let’s say you’re a high-value US government target entering a war zone, into a nation the US government just threw into complete chaos because reasons.

Do you want the details of your location going over secure channels or are insecure channels OK?

[lewislynn]

This e-mail is dated 17 months before the attack, how is it relevant,

You must be the only one privy to cut-off dates.

At what point in time, other than the day of or anytime after, does this become NOT relevant?

except being sent on an unsecured server?

You said it's not relevant, what does it matter how it was sent?