Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

America's newspaper of record? The NYSlimes??? S'plods head meltdown.
1 posted on 09/03/2016 4:34:56 PM PDT by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Be Careful

This newspaper is about as bad as Salon...ROFL...anything they have to say puts National Enquire as number one!!!


2 posted on 09/03/2016 4:36:55 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Be Careful

“The New York Times’ article quotes critics of Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, who said he had become blinkered in his worldview while confined in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and a one dimensional critic of U.S. policy.”

Translation: He has done damage to Hillary, so he is a bastard.


3 posted on 09/03/2016 4:41:24 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Be Careful

In 1963 the NY Times changed their “stylebook” stating that the perpetrators of crimes would no longer be identified by “race.” This newspaper died as a purveyor of “truth” at that moment, although it was softly “progressive” prior to that. To call it the “newspaper of record” has to be, at the most, satire. They have been propagandist scum for a long time. This stylebook change was announced during my Introduction to Journalism class in 1963 and was the reason I decided NOT to go into Journalism.


4 posted on 09/03/2016 4:45:43 PM PDT by noname (to all liberal/communists-were you born stupid or do you have to work at it to stay that way?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Be Careful

Stop telling the truth about Democrats you blinkered world view guy!


7 posted on 09/03/2016 5:00:23 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Be Careful
The one thing that most people don't get and understand is that McCarthy was precisely and positively correct in his assertion that the government was infested by Soviet spies and turncoats. A good place to confirm this is by reading the book: Blacklisted by History by M. Stanton Evans.
8 posted on 09/03/2016 5:01:29 PM PDT by gigster (Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Be Careful

I don’t really like Assange or often agree with his political leanings but I have to have a degree of respect for him.


9 posted on 09/03/2016 5:04:47 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Be Careful

Evidently, there is bad McCarthyism (what Republicans do), and good McCarthyism (what the Dems and the MSM do).


10 posted on 09/03/2016 5:13:30 PM PDT by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Be Careful
The New York Times appears to have lowered itself to Mr. McCarthy’s standards as the article on Assange does not contain one bit of hard evidence . . . .

The guy who typed in that article should google, mccarthy venona papers. google still lets those three words return information about the Venoma Papers. A key source that I believe confirms a lot of what McCarthy said.

Watching TV shows like I Led Three Lives I certainly believed McCarthy.

19 posted on 09/03/2016 8:33:22 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson