Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt

Here’s this from ATF

June 2016
- Addendum
( August 31, 2016)Nitrocellulose - Update

ATF’s June 2016 Explosives Industry Newsletter included a brief discussion of Nitrocellulose,and attempted to clarify the circumstances under which wetted Nitrocellulose is considered a high explosive under 27 CFR, Part 555. As with all explosives, ATF’s focus is on the potential
public safety risks associated with materials that can be misused or diverted to unlawful
purposes.
Subsequent contact from industry members who import, transport, store or employ wetted Nitrocellulose in the production of ammunition, however, has brought to our attention issues that were not fully addressed in the Newsletter and require further consultation and consideration with the industry.
Accordingly, ATF has and will conduct further industry
outreach concerning wetted Nitrocellulose.

**** In the interim, previously authorized industry practices concerning wetted Nitrocellulose will not be affected.******


41 posted on 08/31/2016 11:02:15 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: caww

So .. basically .. the President and the ATF are putting the ammo people out of business by using a regulation; no Congressional involvement.

Disgusting ..!!!!


43 posted on 08/31/2016 11:05:01 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: caww
Perhaps someone pointed out to the ATF that clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws?
57 posted on 09/01/2016 4:53:57 AM PDT by dmcnash (Back off! I'm a Scientist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson