Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MCF

You’ve just made my point. What the Founders intent was that the Senators would vote the way they were directed to do so by the state legislatures. If the Senators refused to follow said instructions, they would do the gentlemanly thing and step down and allow the legislature (or Governor, if not in session) to choose a replacement who would. When the Senators stopped doing that early on and acted independently or in opposition to their state legislatures, it ceased to be what it was intended to be.

The only way to have kept it as the Founders intended was to have made it so that if a Senator went off the proverbial reservation with respect to his state, that a simple legislative majority vote could remove them from office with an immediate election triggered. That way, you’d at least have had close responsiveness to the state legislatures as elected representatives of the people.


64 posted on 08/30/2016 9:22:38 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj
You and I are looking at this differently. The Senators were to represent the States interest irrespective of the party. The longest a Senator could act against the wishes of the State Legislature would be four years then they would be out of a job.
89 posted on 08/30/2016 11:35:29 PM PDT by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson