Posted on 08/27/2016 12:25:35 AM PDT by Enchante
Was Obama ever a professor or was he merely an instructor, lecturer, or adjunct?
Lecturer! This professor talk is total nonsense. He never amounted to anything before we as fools elected him as out Commander in Chief. Shame on us.
This is not a treaty. It’s a joke.
This is exactly right. Somewhere along the way it became customary to accept unratified Treaty provisions and simply call them executive agreements — subject to the will and influence of future administrations.
That’s all executive orders really are.
Obama was never a Constitutional law professor, he was a part-time lecturer on Alinsky.
He was a professional rabble-rouser.
The Constitution says he cannot be President.
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
Let me guess ... It allows China to do pretty much what it wants, but limits US energy production to burning dried panda poop ... that it has to import from China.
Those pushing this climate fraud know exactly what and who they intend to control, having power over you and I is their only goal.
It's OK if everyone else thinks it's a Treaty as long as the US Congress knows that it's not.
The United States IS NOT bound by any word or provision in it.
The congress of the US continues to have no gonads. They can call it agreement, deals, or whatever but they ware still treaties and need senate approval. But the spineless eaters have their heads in their rectums or are just on the tai like everyone else. Obama should have been impeached for fast and furious and using the IRS to slap opponents. So everything else pales by comparison.
The treaty isn’t about controlling the climate. it’s about kneecapping American businesses to favour China. I wonder just how much money Obama has in his offshore bank accounts.
Elitist dreaming. Totally impossible to enforce.
If Clinton is elected, this “Constitutional Law Professor” will be nominated to the Supreme Court.
They don’t plan to control the Sun, but if the Sun “misbehaves” they will claim the political power to manage the side-effects by controlling us. Nothing has to be true or make sense anymore, all they have to do is declare a problem and issue marching orders, whatever they might be.
IIRC Michelle made over 350,000 year on the Chicago hospital board, increased from 175,000 when Obama added a grant to the hospital to a bill on another subject. Then he has his senate pay from Illinois and DC. They SHOULD have less money than the Clintons.
The other night on Coast to Coast radio they detailed how the con tons set up the library and then illegally morphed it into the larger foundation without filing with the feds. I look for Obamas to do the same and collect bribe money retroactively through speaking engagements.
The U.S system of ratifying a treaty is not “complicated” as the article asserts....it is simple....take it to the Senate and get the votes.. ....
It may be hard to do in this instance....like making a full court basketball shot...but its it “complicated”
Senate leadership must stand up and state to those nations signature to the “executive agreement” referenced in the article that it will not be recognized as Obama acted illegally in his part.
Go TRUMP!!!
Simple solution: Donald Trump just ignores it like Obama has ignored our laws.
The two main words in the phrase, "consent" and "concur". It won't happen even though we have a squishy Congress. They like their power when it comes to treaties, although they relinquish it at other times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.