They misinterpreted it.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-22/its-official-canadian-bank-depositors-are-now-risk-bail-ins
No, you and others with an agenda have misinterpreted it, either out of ignorance or intent.
"Under this approach, CDIC would be appointed as the receiver of the non-viable bank and would determine which of the bank’s assets and liabilities should be passed to the bridge institution (including, at a minimum, all insured deposits)"
https://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/consult/tpbrr-rpcrb-eng.pdf
I've found that a quick search ALWAYS discredits the paranoid claims of zerohedge. Thanks for helping me affirm my opinion of them.
Whenever I see an outrageous thread title on FR, but then see zerohedge as the source, I skip it.
I recommend the same for you.