This is indeed a critical point.
She made almost -no effort- to secure the server from hackers; almost like she was inviting certain parties to avail themselves of the contents.
But...she was -very aggressive- in preventing any forensic discovery of what she was passing on to all her foreign ‘donors’.
Excellent point! She kept her server open for hackers, then aggressively shut the door to her own Government. If she becomes the head of the Government, then she never has to worry again about law or ethics. She is ruthless and will be unaccountable to anyone.
I have wondered this often. It is so neglegent that it is an embarrassment to anyone who would be in I.T.
I am beginning to think it was deliberate so information could be sold but instead of a briefcase of money and microfilm its a donation to the Clinton Foundation and you receive an IP address to a insecure server that just happens to have the info you need.
Plausible deniability - seems to have worked so far.
The next link we need is the payouts to the super delegates and how that all worked.
It was a foregone conclusion she had the supers delegates from the get go.
To me its pretty obvious how you make things happen - you pay money for it - just like anything else in life.
Money Makes it Happen
I can almost guarantee you she didn't leave that to chance.