That was Soro’s intent...does not mean he succeeded and there was no evidence in what I read showing he succeeded. the author presumed guilt from actions by bishops who were acting in normal fashion with the Catholic faith. Supporting growth of Christian communities, helping the poor, etc.
Not arguing in defense of Soros...defending the Catholic faith and those who serve within.
Oh, did the Bishops give the money back? If they did, why were Soros' agents so certain, in their report, the money was well spent in furtherance of Soros' agenda?
Social Justice means taking from one (usually by force or threat of force) to give to another. It's another 'ism' and in the long run, only benefits the state, or those in league with the state, and like the anti-Christian act that it is, it eventually destroys both the thriftless and the thrifty (e.g., see the collapse of the Soviet Union, see Cuba, see Venezuela,...).
IMHO, and respectfully, the Church should stick to the practice of encouraging charity through the teaching of the Almighty's word and by setting a righteous example - not by prostituting itself out to globalists in furtherance of power and funding for itself.