He came on the scene seven years before we would be exposed to the fresh breeze of opinion delivered by Rush Limbaugh which would revolutionize the popularization of conservative opinion. But I recall being captivated the first time I saw The McLachlan Group as a really fast-paced, review of topical issues. If there was a weakness in the show, apart from its tendency to reflect establishment opinion, was its superficiality in terms of its handling of topics. The show was always far more interested in inside baseball than it was in the rules of the game. In other words, it covered the horse race much better than it covered substance and foundational principles involved in the war of conservatism against liberalism.
Yet, in the context of the time, it was hard-hitting and gave conservatism, best expressed by the voice of Pat Buchanan, at least a chance to be heard.
Agree.
...but they could have done without that Eleanor Clift broad.
“In keeping with my belief that historic figures should be judged in the context of their times and not judged under currently fashionable standards of political correctness,...”
You’re right - that’s EXACTLY how people should be judged, or assessed, as some people prefer to put it.
Very good point.
You know....if you could keep Pat Buchanan limited to two minutes of straight talk and then cut him off....you got a dozen 3x5 cards of information and wisdom handed to you. But the more he talks...you feel like you are in some 9-hour seminar and just too much information.
Agreed.