[Mollypitcher1]

When “reporters” return to being journalists and not political hacks on the payroll of the Democrats, they will be welcome, I am sure.

[Cboldt]

CNN, Mary Katherine Ham is on, and says that the Trump campaign stepped on its own message by releasing news of the campaign management changes.

CNN is focused on the campaign rearrangement, and projects its sense of what this portends, namely "back to intemperate Trump."

Also focused on Ailes, and Trump association with Ailes makes Trump a sexist, just like Ailes is.

[Cboldt]

-- When "reporters" return to being journalists and not political hacks on the payroll of the Democrats, they will be welcome, I am sure. --

Trump wants his message to get out. He is accessible to the industry. Which industry organ has access should be irrelevant, they all claim to be objective. The reason they are complaining is that campaign duty and WH duty are plum jobs. Perks like you can't imagine.

At any rate, by the press's own standard, banning one or more outlets makes no difference, because they are all objective. Trump is entitled to a different point of view, and by the press's own standard, banning one or more outlet makes no difference in the coverage, because all of them are objective.

Plus, the "banned" outlets spend more time talking about Trump than the other outlets.