Posted on 08/12/2016 7:13:18 AM PDT by Hostage
I say 'MAY HAVE' because it has not been verified to my knowledge.
However, if I was Seth Rich' GF Claudia Kash, I would go into deep hiding and have surrogates contact someone in the Trump campaign. If true, her life is in grave danger.
I will post a screenshot below in case Reddit has 'problems' with the linked page. So far, I am able to see it.
1. Did she preserve the screenshots of Hillary’s website with the different address?
2. Do we still have the addresses from the SOS?
3. Any of the Hillary people who shredded documents or were part of this are part of a felony crime conspiracy.
This, of course, would be voter fraud.
She should absolutely go into deep hiding.
But she should definitely NOT contact the Trump campaign. Of course a GF of a dem staffer would not do that anyway.
I hope the #BernieorBust crowd sees this... They were screwed from the start.
Agree - but I posted the pic of the GF so that no one hares away in a completely wrong direction based on faulty information.
This info has been around for a number of days and one would hope that some Bernie supporters could go back to the old pages and compare notes on Hillary and Bernie voting localities.
Remember when journalists praised leakers?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/us/08pentagon.html?_r=0
Thanks for that adjustment/correction. To be fair, the screenshot above does have a ‘?’ after Claudia’s name.
This may have legs.
CONSPIRACY THEORY LIST PING!
Any cached pages for dnc v. hillary polling places websites via internet archives site? My internetz skills aren’t very good.
“wayback search” at top of page
You are so right!
This has been bothering me: the original report was he was talking on his cell phone to his girlfriend, and she overheard noise on his end of the line. He told her NOT TO WORRY about it. Did he think he had everything under control? Did he know the assailants?
I am hoping they exist. My time is a little limited today.
REQUEST! Freepers with skills and time, please investigate Hillary’s primary site if it’s still up and copy any existing pages that direct voters to polling places. Then, check SOS website and do the same. Finally, compare the lists.
You nailed it. Someone has been drinking too much bath water.
BM’d.
I think that is an insight to how Philadelphia precincts could poll at 110% of registered voters in 2012.
They just vote FOR the ones that don't show up and forge the signatures and add them to the count.
No precinct in America has that percentage turnout.
Look at some of the stunts they pulled in Arizona:
http://usuncut.com/politics/5-examples-voter-suppression-arizona-primary/
Fake but accurate? Maybe, maybe not.
The process for getting some verification is briefly outlined in post #31.
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
RIGHT!!!!
If you look at this...the guys who run voting in the DC region had to know some element of the expected turn-out and that Bernie probably would get a high showing. So this invented gimmick of dual polling places was the invention....which I would take a guess that they did this in dozens of states to help influence the numbers that she pulled in.
This guy was simply the unlucky fool who added up how thing went and figured out the game....asked questions....and then they got worried because he would spill the beans. The thing is....he actually spilt the bigger mess of beans with the emails. But legally, there’s a five-star story sitting there about ballot-rigging and how Hillary probably was beat by Bernie.
They go to this kid quick. Meanwhile the drug cartels can’t find sean Penn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.