Nope. It isn’t. These people were around then and were the most accurate in their predictions.
All they’re saying is that they are NOW using the methodology that is correct while other polling firms all go to that same methodology by the time the election actually rolls around.
Nonsense. This site didn't exist 30 years ago, it doesn't even look liked it existed before January. The methodology, such that it exists, is ridiculous. It's the same stupid crap as "Unskewed Polls". It is totally made up BS.
For the umpteenth time, you can NOT "unskew" a poll. You can reject it, accept it, incorporate it into an average of polls - but you can not "unskew" it, which is exactly what this website is doing.
Monmouth weight - skewing by the latest poll today. D +9%. ‘I’ skewed over by about +10%.
26% Republican
39% Independent
35% Democrat
47% Male
53% Female
http://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_US_080816/
Hillary is outperforming Obama in 2008 according to the liberals at Monmouth.
“These people were around then and were the most accurate in their predictions.”
Who is “these people”? Please link their track record.