To: Mariner
If you put weapons or external fuel on a 16, it underperforms the 35 in every category.
You say that as if there should be equivalence between a 1970's and a 2010's plane, not to mention price.
35 is a dud, everyone knows it is just a cash cow for the elites and their crony corporations.
42 posted on
08/05/2016 8:36:08 PM PDT by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: 867V309
On the price question, the difference is not the great with full production costs of the 35 at $84mil (2018 and beyond) vs $80mil for the latest 16.
46 posted on
08/05/2016 8:44:02 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson