Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tau Food
-- It is a big deal if the payments were for ransom rather than just a refund of the money that Iran had paid for those weapons way back when. --

Instead of "rather than," it can be both. Was the release of the hostages contingent on receipt of the funds? If yes, then it's ransom. It doesn't matter if we owed them the money or not - an issue that has been under dispute for decades.

58 posted on 08/05/2016 11:51:16 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Instead of "rather than," it can be both. Was the release of the hostages contingent on receipt of the funds? If yes, then it's ransom. It doesn't matter if we owed them the money or not - an issue that has been under dispute for decades.

I think that the important intent is the intent of the person doing the act, in this case paying the money. Only the person who does something knows why he/she did it.

More generally, the underlying problem, as I see it, is that it is not in the best interest of the American people for crazy people in the world to think that we pay ransoms for kidnapped Americans. So, why would I want crazy people to think that? Answer: I don't.

59 posted on 08/05/2016 12:11:45 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson