Replies

How many reasonable, pertinent questions have I asked so far, that you have dodged? I wouldn’t have raised this issue with you if I’d thought you were mindlessly committed to your evidence-free narrative. I had imagined you could process information. I’d hate to be completely wrong.

One last question. Stanley Ann had attended university in HI through the fall of ‘60. Contrary to all known facts, some claim she remained in HI, hidden in a remote cave, through Obama’s birth in ‘61.

Then, according to the Obots, she took her newborn on a long flight [these are the same Obots, btw, who claim it would have been against airline policy for SA to have flown out of Africa with a newborn in ‘61] to Seattle. She then attended one semester at the U of WA, and then flew back to HI to continue at the university there.

Why? Why leave her parents and her school of choice, for one semester in Seattle?

And let’s not have imaginary theories, either. Please give a plausible, fact-based reason for this bizarre behavior.

The judge will hear Obama's testimony that he was born in Hawaii, he will read the birth certificate, he will note that no one is providing any evidence to the contrary and the judge will find, ten times out of ten, that all of the evidence points to Hawaii as the birthplace and that there exists no evidence to the contrary.

That's the way it works.

You have lots of additional questions, but as your legal experience develops, you will learn that with every piece of evidence, more questions can always be asked and you can always make things just as convoluted and confusing for yourself as you wish.

The rules of evidence are designed to force the parties to present evidence rather than more questions. The purpose of these rules is to enable a finder of fact to rationally separate what is true from what is false (or conjecture) in an orderly, disciplined way.

I think you should try to reconcile yourself to the truth. If your desires are impeding you from accepting the truth, then just try to quit thinking about this issue. It's already been resolved by other people and there is nothing left for you to actually do. In other words, if you cannot accept the truth, then at least accept that it doesn't matter whether or not you accept it. It's over.

Btw, in addition to bring bizarre, Stanley Ann’s behavior was very expensive. A one way ticket from HI to Seattle wouldn’t have been cheap. Plus, according to Obots, she was living rent free with her parents. At Washington State, she had to pay room and board. Then there was the one way ticket back to HI after her lone semester in Seattle concluded. SA didn’t have money to burn. So why two ling, expensive, and totally unnecessary airline flights?