Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

So what missle? From where? Why? Military Accident? What is the alternative theory? It is suggested that there was a cover up. Then the government had something to hide.

So which is the conspiracy theory?


2 posted on 08/03/2016 9:59:21 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tenacious 1
What is a missle?

You need to get back a lot further than this article to get it, and what you are talking about? Our military had nothing to do with this but a certain president from the time did.

8 posted on 08/03/2016 10:12:41 AM PDT by Kaslin (He neededAwesome the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tenacious 1

There was definitely a conspiracy, and it involved Kallstrom among others. The CIA took over a flight “accident” before there was any evidence at all it involved terrorism. FBI took over from FAA and NTSB and completely controlled the chains of evidence.

The missile had to come from a ship. 800 was out of range of a shoulder-fired missile.

So that leaves either a terrorist boat or a US surface ship or sub. He finds a P-3 Orion hovering right above the area, where, just two weeks earlier, they conducted a missile exercise. That’s all he says.


14 posted on 08/03/2016 10:18:05 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tenacious 1
So what missle?

Don't know.

From where?

Iran.

Why?

Former Iranian Republican guard soldiers turned mercenaries hired by a wealthy Iranian family to avenge the death of their family members killed in the 1988 Iran Air flight 655 shoot down by the USS Vincennes.

Military Accident?

No. Deliberate act of revenge.

It is suggested that there was a cover up.

I know someone who was involved in this coverup. Absolutely it was a coverup. Clinton was running for reelection. The very last thing he wanted was to deal with a War with Iran just before an election. Another factor was the disastrous effect on Air Travel that announcing the truth would cause.

Then the government had something to hide.

Clinton did.

15 posted on 08/03/2016 10:21:17 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tenacious 1

FIM-92 or Sa-14/16/18 Style manpads that the Taliban were known to have.
Recall the USS Cole bombing was terrorism.
Also the 1993 Trade Center bombing.
I wonder how many other terrorist attacks during the Clinton years went unacknowledged and unresponded to.

And recall that Clinton was once offered Osama Bin Laden on a platter, and Clinton refused to nab him.
His excuse when asked about it later,”Hyuck hyuck, Osama hadn’t done anything to us yet. hyuck hyuck.”


21 posted on 08/03/2016 10:59:12 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tenacious 1

Of course it was a cover up. The Clintons were in charge weren’t they?


31 posted on 08/03/2016 6:07:25 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson