Replies

Not when you’re right.

That’s arrogant.

We were right in 2008 & 2012 and this is what happens:

The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
Translated into English from an article appearing in the Czech Republic as published in the Prager Zeitung of 28 April 2010

Powerful and painfully true. I often say that I blame the voters far more than the politicians. The nature of the Clintons is to lie, cheat and steal. They've been doing it on our national stage for close to 25 years, and longer when you go back to their days in Arkansas. Despite ever new scandals like the email server and Benghazi, they continue to enjoy the support of enough voters (the 47% that Romney correctly identified and then threw away by sending Ryan out to apologize for it in the VP debate) across the country to have Her Heinous able to rig the nomination for herself to get the rest of the votes she needed and now directly challenge for the White House.

There is no longer a when that will occur and these people will suddenly come to their senses. They won't. You have to win by taking as much of the remaining 53% as possible and when you get in, must remove every last vestige of the previous regime and relentlessly push your agenda while making no pretense of being bipartisan. You won, they lost and your superior policies and ideas are the only game in town. When you succeed, as Reagan succeeded, you will gain enough to your side to be firmly in control.

We were right in 2008 & 2012

With a vain "reach across the aisle" wacko-bird coasting on sentimental and suspect credentials and the narcissistic Mormon author of Romneycare who folded like a cheap suit when his cheesy smile failed to dazzle his opponent in the debates?—couldn't even stand up to Monica Crowley, much less the muslim brotherhood's man in Washington? I don't think so. They were nominated by the media specifically because they would be so easy for that same media cabal to take down.