“No, he’s an IT specialist who helps lawyers “automate” (use computer technology) their practice of law.”
Ah... He is an enabler of shyster lawyers.
Seems an insignificant distinction...
It is (insignificant), for purposes of being misleading. But the poster I made the remark to suggested maybe Khan was in line to be rewarded with a SCOTUS (or some other judicial) appointment, and in that context, the man's craft doesn't fit.