Because he is the candidate whose position, if they had been in place, would have prevented Kahn and his son from entering the U.S. And whose most influential advisor would deport Kahn and his family immediately. That's why he was there.
“Because he is the candidate whose position, if they had been in place, would have prevented Kahn and his son from entering the U.S. And whose most influential advisor would deport Kahn and his family immediately. That’s why he was there.”
So Khan was there to stop something in the past, like Terminator style? No, not at all. Bogus reasoning.
Khan was there to support his business and income. He runs an immigration law firm in NYC, specializing in Muslim immigration. He supports Sharia in America and is connected with the Muslim Brotherhood. Get a frickin clue.
If he cared about his son’s legacy AT ALL he wouldn’t support the Democrats. It was the Democrat Congress which cut Iraq OCO funding in 2007 ensuring the US withdrawal and the ascendency of ISIS.
Khan and the Democrats are equally corrupt. Money before morals. A marriage of convenience and greed.