Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Undercover Video Confirms Hillary’s Strategy to Ban All Firearms
The New American ^ | 26 July 2016 | Bob Adelmann

Posted on 07/26/2016 5:29:59 PM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
This has been the plan since 1962...

May be, but I do not intend to play their game, nor do I intend to follow unConstitutional laws. Like one of our FRiends posted a few months ago:

"No. Your turn."

"Never Forget, even for an instant, that the one and only reason anybody has for taking your gun away is to make you weaker than he is, so he can do something to you that you wouldn't allow him to do if you were equipped to prevent it. This goes for burglars, muggers, and rapists, and even more so for policemen, bureaucrats, and politicians." -Alexander Hope, from the novel 'Hope' by L. Neil Smith and Aaron Zelman

41 posted on 07/26/2016 6:24:52 PM PDT by aragorn (We do indeed live in interesting times. FUBO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dirt for sale; Travis McGee

As I was once told by a fellow freeper.
The media will be the first to - ahem- cease stealing our oxygen.
Then, the folks doing the door to doors will have to think long and hard before entering the door of a patriot waiting on the other side with a Barret .50bmg. And who might be prepared and willing to fight back.
Several ncidents like that will make them realize they are a target, wherever they may hang their JBT gear.
Those .50’s or similar arms go through several feet of just about most “soft” mediums before losing its momentum. think for a minute, there are thousands if not hundreds of thousands in this country who know how to make and employ ied’s.
Not to mention other ex military folks trained in such ways as to “counter” the no knock raids.
Word will get around quickly, when those anti-americans leave their compounds. Shutting down cell or landline service ain’t gonna work either.
The body count would be enormous.

All this of course is in my humble opinion.

Ping to you Travis, I’d like to, and many others as well -hear your take on the “upcoming all out ban” on concerning our rtkba.


42 posted on 07/26/2016 6:26:47 PM PDT by BigpapaBo (If it don't kill you it'll make you _________!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: detective

Hillary truly is HITLER-Y the GUN GRABBER.


43 posted on 07/26/2016 6:30:34 PM PDT by Twinkie (JOHN 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justa

I heard my sheriff say that there would be no going door to door
to confiscate guns in our county. Hope that when he retires the successor
feels the same. Likely will.


44 posted on 07/26/2016 6:34:41 PM PDT by Rockpile (GOP legislators-----caviar eating surrender monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Molon Labbie

I read some conjecture on confiscation the other day and it was proposed that they know going door to door won’t work. Instead, since they know who has guns and who doesn’t, they will call for voluntary surrender. If you don’t then they will start taking away privileges. You get a letter that your driver’s license will not be renewed, that your kids don’t qualify for student loans, etc. There are thousands of ways they can mess with you until you comply.


45 posted on 07/26/2016 6:36:17 PM PDT by burghguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Justa

Your answer is akin to that of the Jews in the 1930’s Germany when told, mostly by other Jews, that if and when Hitler came to power, he would exterminate them. Their main responses were: He won’t do that. He can’t do that. That is political talk, it will never happen. He don’t mean it. Our Gentile neighbors will protect us. History tells us what happened.


46 posted on 07/26/2016 6:42:23 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: detective

HillyBilly can’t confiscate guns without a national gun registry (which will be ignored) and she can’t repeal the Second Amendment without Congress’ help. Fat chance in either case.

All the gungrabbers can do is hurl insults & call names.

Want to start bashing in doors? Then get ready to die.


47 posted on 07/26/2016 6:43:11 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
New DNC campaign slogan - Truth Sucks!
48 posted on 07/26/2016 6:45:53 PM PDT by Barnacle (Thank you... Thank you very much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Maybe..


49 posted on 07/26/2016 6:52:25 PM PDT by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Great to see all the optimism. I’m not giving Americans enough credit, perhaps... But we all saw what happened in NO after Katrina, and In Boston... I may have the fault of overestimating the enemy but I certainly don’t underestimate him. America is the lynch pin. If it falls all obstacles to world communism are kaput.


50 posted on 07/26/2016 6:54:03 PM PDT by Dirt for sale (QS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dirt for sale

For some reason I see this upcoming election like what took place in Britain with Brexit. This is America’s Brexit.


51 posted on 07/26/2016 7:08:01 PM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior; umgud
>> With her supreme court,it should be easy.
>
> Yeah, overturning Heller would be about as easy as overturning Roe v. Wade. Neither is gonna happen...

I suspect that overturning Roe v. Wade is far easier than you suppose. Imagine, for a moment if the executive unilaterally declared ObamaCare to be invalid under the "right to privacy of medical records [from the government]" because it mandates government access to those medical records.

Under this situation, I ask this: which overreach would the government strive to control more, the condoning of and indirect murdering of unborn citizens, or the mandated government control of all health-care for all citizens? — keep in mind that with the latter they could eventually work up to "birth licensing" — so, the decision that would ensure more government control of lives is obviously controlling medical care.

As it stands now, nobody in the GOP[e] is willing to make the move to force the USSC to make the choice. (I suspect that is because they would lose one of their "oh my God! you have to vote for us because nobody else will fight it!" [after which they will promptly do nothing].)

52 posted on 07/26/2016 7:08:54 PM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Molon Labbie

I hope you are right, but if the people who love the Soviet Union and China under Mao win this election I think they will see their green light. The first to go will be government employees at all levels that disagree with them. Then it is us. The military leaders have already been scrubbed.


53 posted on 07/26/2016 7:21:37 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Molon Labbie; combat_boots
>> How does she do that? How does anyone do that?

Personally, I think it'll be a false-flag operation, or rather a series of them, though it could also be taking advantage of a crisis.

  1. A town is attacked by terrorists, this could be false-flag or real.
  2. The military is deployed to that city where they:
  3. A) surround the city blocking off all travel,
  4. B) control all communication (jamming radio, cell, cutting internet, etc),
  5. C) cut off civilian power and water, if these were not what was attacked in #1,
  6. D) set up a "secure area" (probably outside the city) with food, water and basic amenities,
  7. E) because it's a controlled secure area, they will probably disarm everyone coming in,
  8. F) they will then have an empty city to simply take guns from; if they need to they can recruit patriots to help them run seek and destroy missions finding weapons caches from the "terrorists" and confiscating/destroying found weapons/ammo.
  9. Return the weaponless people to the now weaponless city.
  10. Break the story as a great success rooting out domestic terrorists. (People refusing to give up their guns, "preppers" who refuse to go to the "secure area", etc.)
  11. Repeat.

54 posted on 07/26/2016 7:26:36 PM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: burghguy; All

... since they know who has guns and who doesn’t,...
********************************
That’s only true in some locales or applies to guns purchased after the mandatory paperwork for a background check.

I have only inherited guns and guns purchased before the background checks began.

There are many other gun owners like me, where the gov’t. can’t possibly know the quantity or types of guns owned.


55 posted on 07/26/2016 7:50:51 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: detective
Probably 10 million deer hunters in this country....

Don't need an AR.....

I've owned a .243...a .270...300 mag..and a .308...Deer rifle's all.....

One was a semi-auto....I sold that...because a friend needed a smaller caliber for his daughter.

Plenty of calibers to shoot deer...and people...if that is needed.

10 million hunters...are armed..and don't need AR's....

FWIW-

56 posted on 07/26/2016 8:16:19 PM PDT by Osage Orange (You hurt my family...you better watch your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: octex
We honest patriotic Americans...should just sell each other guns...and no registration is required.....

I've a few of those...inherited or bought.

57 posted on 07/26/2016 8:19:10 PM PDT by Osage Orange (You hurt my family...you better watch your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: octex

I think you are being incredibly naive if you believe you can hide anything from this government. The have Google, Facebook and endless other social media sites working for them, plus they follow your purchasing. Do you buy cleaning supplies for the guns you have off the radar? How about ammo? Do you go to the range to shoot? Have you ever admitted to owning non-registered guns on any website? Of course you have. You just did. I am sorry my FRiend, but they know who has the guns or at least they have reason to suspect, which for them assumes you are guilty and until you prove otherwise you will be subject to their rules. I hate it, but I know they KNOW.


58 posted on 07/27/2016 5:58:20 AM PDT by burghguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BigpapaBo

That’s what is going to happen, among other things.


59 posted on 07/27/2016 6:14:12 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
We honest patriotic Americans...should just sell each other guns...and no registration is required.....

State laws forbidding that are more common than you may think. In those states exercising your constitutional rights means no longer being a law-abiding citizen.

60 posted on 07/27/2016 9:23:27 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson