[Lurking Libertarian]

Many of the speakers and our nominee don’t support enough of it, though, and that’s a sad fact.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3451913/posts

[Persevero]

I’m fine with a homosexual man (Peter Thiel) deciding, on balance, that the Republican party best represents his interests and views. He can vote, support financially, whatever. Good for him.

What I am not fine with is him giving the appearance that the Republican Party stands for the homosexual agenda now (homo marriage, laws crushing freedom of religion and freedom of association and freedom of speech, re-education, forcing of sodomy promotion in the public schools, infiltration of the military).

If we stand for that I can’t go along with it.