Posted on 07/23/2016 9:15:59 AM PDT by GilGil
Now add Tim Kaine to the mix. In our irrational minds where we compare everything to our personal experience Kaine will play the part of the beta male husband whose wife cant stop complaining about her terrible co-worker, Donald Trump. No guy wants to hear eight years of that. They get enough of it at home.
My prediction is that Kaine will do nothing to improve Clintons standing with women. But the Clinton-Kaine ticket is a persuasion disaster in terms of the male vote. Male egos are probably already at a historical low point. Kaine puts a face to that movie. Will men vote to watch Hillary Clinton make Tim Kaine her Whitehouseboy for eight years?
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.dilbert.com ...
“This landslide meme breeds complacency and complacency assures defeat.”
__________________________
You clearly do not know how to win.
Totally disagree with your statement.
Trump has a better than even shot at a landslide. In order to get there he will mobilize every single last resource he has in order to carpet bomb Hillary.
His victory is dependent on launching the most vicious attacks on Hillary he can muster. That will be the path to a landslide.
Anything less will spell defeat. This is not complacency in any way. You have to play to win. Screw your head on right.
Hillary has actually broken 50 in some national polls within the past month.
_______________________
Which national polls? Were the internals 50% democrat and 10% republican. What were the polls?
Those stats look great, but I have a question: Real Clear Politics says that there were 28.6 million total votes cast for the democrats during the presidential primaries, but there were only 20.9 million total votes cast for republicans—why do you think that is?
It seems strange that the republicans would have picked up that many new registrations but such a low percentage of turnout (70%+). The democrats had 100%+ turnout according to the numbers you provided. I guess I hoped to see close to the same number of votes cast for dems vs. reps.
I know it’s all about turnout on election day, but those numbers just don’t seem right to me—where do you think the discrepancy lies?
MY GOD!
I started to watch a race at 1:00, Crooked Hillary nodding, and the baby-killing “catholic” running his mouth now for 57 minutes...no end in sight.
Shuuuuuuuuut Up!
Sanders voters wanted change. See my post No. 73 in this thread.
That makes sense—I hope you’re right!!!
It's still Hillary's to lose because for far too large a swath of the population, if the Democrats don't win, they don't eat.
Fortunately, she is still very capable of losing it.
Never underestimate the stupidity of Americans.
If it’s close (i.e. <10% diff), klinton wins by massive fraud.
More like “Who Sewed It Better?” What’s with all the excessive material between the buttons? Tacky.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.