Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rb22982; expat_panama; Toddsterpatriot

Interesting article....the percentage of subprime mortgages made by exempt, private sector lenders was even greater than I thought if this number is accurate. This is pretty much in line with what I’d been thinking, although Toddster’s find about the GSEs being pressured to make Alt-A loans still has to be a significant factor.

“It is clear to anyone who has studied the financial crisis of 2008 that the private sector’s drive for short-term profit was behind it. More than 84 percent of the sub-prime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending. These private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year. Out of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006, only one was subject to the usual mortgage laws and regulations. The nonbank underwriters made more than 12 million subprime mortgages with a value of nearly $2 trillion. The lenders who made these were exempt from federal regulations.


62 posted on 07/23/2016 5:19:34 AM PDT by Pelham (Best.Election.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham; rb22982; expat_panama
By 2002, Fannie and Freddie had bought well over $1 trillion of subprime and other low quality loans. Fannie and Freddie were by far the largest part of this effort, but the FHA, Federal Home Loan Banks, Veterans Administration and other agencies--all under congressional and HUD pressure--followed suit. This continued through the 1990s and 2000s until the housing bubble--created by all this government-backed spending--collapsed in 2007. As a result, in 2008, before the mortgage meltdown that triggered the crisis, there were 27 million subprime and other low quality mortgages in the US financial system. That was half of all mortgages. Of these, over 70% (19.2 million) were on the books of government agencies like Fannie and Freddie, so there is no doubt that the government created the demand for these weak loans; less than 30% (7.8 million) were held or distributed by the banks, which profited from the opportunity created by the government.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/12/hey-barney-frank-the-government-did-cause-the-housing-crisis/249903/

63 posted on 07/23/2016 7:16:43 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: Pelham
clear to anyone who has studied the financial crisis of 2008 that the private sector’s drive for short-term profit was behind it.

Even if that were so the next question would be whether that greed was pushing or being pulled.  there really is a lot to this and easy answers don't satisfy.

68 posted on 07/23/2016 7:03:28 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson