Ok then, point out out the place where I make ‘the usual liberal excuses for blacks’ being so wildly, EXTREMELY disproportionately involved in committing violent crime’.
Hint: You will not be able to.
You are picking a fight for absolutely no reason.
Have a Snickers bar.
Your position, plainly, is that someone like Matthews is immoral and wrong for keying on the high correlation between certain racial groups and crime. Well, if that’s wrong, why is it wrong? I already know your liberal position — it cannot be due to real racial differences, it has to be attributable to some excuse, like government programs, evil whitey, etc. Cuckservatives CONSTANTLY say, “Look! The democrats are the REAL racists!” because they want to virtue-signal, and out-liberal the liberals on race issues, so they don’t lose their incomes, are seen as good people, etc.
Political correctness is quite pervasive.
So how am I wrong? Is it your position that the differences must be attributed to/excused? If not, are poverty of choices not the result of poor character?
Your position, plainly, is that someone like Matthews is immoral and wrong for keying on the high correlation between certain racial groups and crime. Well, if that’s wrong, why is it wrong? I already know your liberal position — it cannot be due to real racial differences, it has to be attributable to some excuse, like government programs, evil whitey, etc. Cuckservatives CONSTANTLY say, “Look! The democrats are the REAL racists!” because they want to virtue-signal, and out-liberal the liberals on race issues, so they don’t lose their incomes, are seen as good people, etc.
Political correctness is quite pervasive.
So how am I wrong? Is it your position that the differences must be attributed to/excused by whatever? If not, are poverty of choices not the result of poor character?