I don’t have much longer to write tonight, but once again, I never said or suggested that.
In fact, I’ve said just the opposite. I said this would clearly be unjustified in a case where he was a loiterer refusing to leave, or even in a much more serious case, as long as the suspect actually surrendered properly.
Please, if you want to discuss things, actually stick to what the person is saying.
It is only that he did a very dangerous, highly antisocial thing, something that was also resisting arrest, and that he still needed to be physically arrested, that I see a rationale for what the troopers did.
“I see a rationale for what the troopers did.”
Interesting. You started your defense of the officer saying ‘a physical response’ had been triggered by the high speed chase and adrenalin affected his condition.
Now you are saying it was a rational response to beat him up because he might try to flee or die by a cop’s gun ...